gracias catitaaaaa a jugar #SuperSmashBros

gracias catitaaaaa a jugar #SuperSmashBros

pal frio con @guillettori esperando al @gunseric  y el peter q se hace el loco xD

pal frio con @guillettori esperando al @gunseric y el peter q se hace el loco xD

never get tired of @neildegrassetyson and #Cosmos #Netflix you rock!

never get tired of @neildegrassetyson and #Cosmos #Netflix you rock!

Episode 13: Unafraid of the Dark, Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey

(via thedragoninmygarage)

skunkbear:

The recent release of “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" reminded me of one of my favorite ape vs. man films – this 1932 video that shows a baby chimpanzee and a baby human undergoing the same basic psychological tests.

Its gets weirder – the human baby (Donald) and the chimpanzee baby (Gua) were both raised as humans by their biological/adopted father Winthrop Niles Kellogg.  Kellogg was a comparative psychologist fascinated by the interplay between nature and nurture, and he devised a fascinating (and questionably ethical) experiment to study it:

Suppose an anthropoid were taken into a typical human family at the day of birth and reared as a child. Suppose he were fed upon a bottle, clothed, washed, bathed, fondled, and given a characteristically human environment; that he were spoken to like the human infant from the moment of parturition; that he had an adopted human mother and an adopted human father.

First, Kellogg had to convince his pregnant wife he wasn’t crazy:

 …the enthusiasm of one of us met with so much resistance from the other that it appeared likely we could never come to an agreement upon whether or not we should even attempt such an undertaking.

She apparently gave in, because Donald and Gua were raised, for nine months, as brother and sister. Much like Caesar in the “Planet of the Apes” movies, Gua developed faster than her “brother,” and often outperformed him in tasks. But she soon hit a cognitive wall, and the experiment came to an end. (Probably for the best, as Donald had begun to speak chimpanzee.)

You can read more about Kellogg’s experiment, its legacy, and public reaction to it here.

(via thedragoninmygarage)

kyokushin-karate:

Masutatsu Oyama

chazzthejazz:

Fuckin’ Marge Simpson, people.

chazzthejazz:

Fuckin’ Marge Simpson, people.

(via zofr0)

jtotheizzoe:

astrotastic:

Jesus Christ you guys.

If you wish to make waffles from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

(via thedragoninmygarage)

Now, what’s the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there’s no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I’m asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so.
Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark (via thedragoninmygarage)

and thats Sagan style

tattoome:

Reblog & save

tattoome:

Reblog & save

Chilean, having problems to fill out a description :S yay The Beatles!

twitter.com/hernanGm

view archive



Just Ask

Submit!!!!